Wednesday 24 August 2011

Assessment One: Media Use Diary

Today’s post is all about Assessment One: Media Use Diary. This assessment required me to record my daily media use over a period of two weeks. Our definition of what counted in ‘media use’ covered everything from reading a book to watching television and going on the computer. Throughout this blog post, I will be analysing the data I recorded and discussing which media I used and produced – when, where, how and why. I will then discuss and explain why I believe I follow this pattern of media use. Comparing my results to other members of the JOUR1111 class, I will determine what this says about my relationship with journalism and communications.

The table above shows a spreadsheet of my complete daily media usage over a period of two weeks (from 8th August – 15th August). The time spent using or producing this media, is recorded in minutes. Before explaining my table further, it may help if I explain a little bit about myself.

In February 2011, I moved to Australia for the first time after leaving when I was three weeks old. I spend the last 16 years of my life living in Hong Kong where my family still lives. As I went to an international school, most of my friends went their separate ways after we graduated in 2010. I was the only person in my graduating class to move to Brisbane and thus, I now live very far away from majority of my friends and family. This means that media such as Skype, my phone, Facebook and email are all very vital to me to be able to communicate with the friends and family I don’t get to see as often anymore. 

At first observation we can see that my most commonly used medium to access media, is the computer. Further, Skype and Facebook are my two most popular media. This is purely for communication reasons and both of which get accessed for close to (if not more than) an hour a day. Throughout the 21st century, the access to social media has expanded at a very rapid pace and has changed the way journalism works and the way we communicate with each other. By observing the class survey, we can see that out of the 118 people who responded to the survey, all of them are connected to a Facebook account – with 96.6% having one account and 3.4% having two accounts.



You can also observe that I do have a Twitter and Blogger account. This however, is because of my enrolment in the JOUR1111 course and had never been activated before my commencement at UQ. As you may also observe, both accounts don’t get used very often as I’m still not very interested in either form of media and find them more to be a task to complete then a form of media that I would actively take part in willingly. By also comparing my results to the class results, we can see that in the case of 2011 JOUR1111 class, most members didn’t have a Twitter or Blogger account before starting this unit.




My second most used medium to access media is my phone. Since my purchase of a internet-enabled smart phone in July, I’d say that my phone usage has increase rapidly over the last two months. This has also meant that I now spend more time on Facebook. The number of calls and texts I make has also increased since February which has in turn increased my overall media usage.



As my phone is the only way I access the radio (seeming I don’t own a car and don’t listen to the radio at home because of iTunes), this also adds to the increased phone usage. The times I listen to the radio are to and from university and work. When looking at the class survey, we can come to an assumed conclusion that, as majority of the unit have an internet-enabled smart phone, then most of us are seeing an increased consumption of social networking media such as Facebook since the introduction of Smart Phones. The changing way in which society is accessing these networks means a change in the way we do journalism (shifting more towards a larger segment of citizen journalism as it’s easier and more acceptable for citizens to produce, spread and consume news), and the way we communicate. 


Through the data I have collected about my own media use and the use of those in JOUR1111, we can observe that there has in fact been a very obvious shift in the mediums society use to consume media. For example; older methods of consuming and producing news (hardcopy news papers, television and radio – produced traditionally by journalist and reporters only) have been over taken by online news and citizen journalism through means such as news websites, Facebook, Blogging and Twitter. This can be seen through the large amounts of time spend on the computer and very little time spend watching television, reading news papers or listening to the radio.

It can be seen in my table above that I have recoded spending some of my time reading hardcopy news papers, regardless of this shift. However, this is only the MX and I only consume this media because its content is free and easily accessible. Often I get the MX for the purpose of their Sudoku and end up just skimming through the news pages. It can also be seen that I don’t often watch television. This is because a. I’ve never really been a big television watcher, which leads to the reasoning for b. I don’t have a television plugged in, in my house. 


In conclusion, if we observe the pie chart below, we can see that both the computer and my phone play a big role in my media consumption as they are the most used. I believe that this says that I deem communication to be a very important part of my life. As a Journalism student though, I’d say that my relationship with journalistic forums such as Twitter, Blogger and using Facebook as a means to produce news, weren’t up to scratch. This is probably something I’ll have to force myself to get used to over time if I ever want to become a successful journalist in the twenty-first century.



Monday 15 August 2011

Lecture Three: Telling Factual Stories With Pictures

This lecture discussed the use of images in journalism today and how this use of images to aid text developed. On of the topic that was brought up was today's use of Photoshop and the manipulation of images.

*Word to add to mental dictionary: Fauxtography (digital manipulation). 





World English Dictionary

1. Photoshop  
— vb  , -shops -shopping -shopped
tr to alter (a digital photograph or other image), using animage editing 
application, especially Adobe Photoshop. 


Urban Dictionary 
2. Photoshop
Something used to make ugly people average looking.
Girl: Oh my god! I just photo shopped my acne - now random strangers online will think I'm pretty.

I wonder how Adobe feels about that - their program becoming a verb (photo shopped)? What does this say about our society? When beauty is no longer natural, but instead a 'photoshopped' image. Are pictures still worth a thousand words if the visual story is being digitally manipulated? This distorted sense of 'beauty' is something that, even from a very young age, has always held it's very own chip of my shoulder. Growing up with so many of my friends developing eating disorders in such a conformist manner, was somewhat disheartening and a struggle no teenager should have to face, to say the least. It is not what we have that empowers or destroys us, it is how we use it - so why are so many of us belittling ourself (and those around us) by conforming to the social perceptions of 'beauty'. 




We then went on to discuss what makes a great photo - which linked so closely to my COMU1999 lessons - how handy! Tips that were discussed in the lecture: 
  • Framing 
  • Focus 
  • Angle and Point of View (POV)
  • Exposure (Lighting)
  • Timing (Shutter speed) 
  • Capturing the moment 




"A picture has no meaning at all if it can't tell a story." 
Eetu Silanpaa

Sunday 14 August 2011

Journalists, what else are we missing?

Just an interesting article that I found - got me thinking; in a world and culture that is so pragmatic, we often miss out on all the extraordinary, talented, interesting and amazing people and places that this world has to offer. It is not often enough that I allow myself to appreciate this; to be shocked and arrested by the sheer beauty of the world we live in and the company I share it with. 

Article:




Washington, DC Metro Station on a cold January morning in 2007. The man with a violin played six Bach pieces for about 45 minutes. During that time approx. 2 thousand people went through the station, most of them on their way to work. After 3 minutes a middle aged man noticed there was a musician playing. He slowed his pace and stopped for a few seconds and then hurried to meet his schedule.

4 minutes later: The violinist received his first dollar: a woman threw the money in the hat and, without stopping, continued to walk.


6 minutes: A young man leaned against the wall to listen to him, then looked at his watch and started to walk again.


10 minutes: A 3-year old boy stopped but his mother tugged him along hurriedly. The kid stopped to look at the violinist again, but the mother pushed hard and the child continued to walk, turning his head all the time. This action was repeated by several other children.. Every parent, without exception, forced their children to move on quickly..


45 minutes: The musician played continuously. Only 6 people stopped and listened for a short while. About 20 gave money but continued to walk at their normal pace. The man collected a total of $32.


1 hour: He finished playing and silence took over. No one noticed. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition.


No one knew this, but the violinist was Joshua Bell, one of the greatest musicians in the world. He played one of the most intricate pieces ever written, with a violin worth $3.5 million dollars. Two days before Joshua Bell sold out a theater in Boston where the seats averaged $100.
This is a true story. Joshua Bell playing incognito in the metro station was organized by the Washington Post as part of a social experiment about perception, taste and people’s priorities.

The questions raised:

*In a common place environment at an inappropriate hour, do we perceive beauty?
*Do we stop to appreciate it?
*Do we recognize talent in an unexpected context?

One possible conclusion reached from this experiment could be this:

If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world, playing some of the finest music ever written, with one of the most beautiful instruments ever made.

How many other things are we missing?

A Whole World Of Crazy

I found this little ramble about the complexities of the English language that I thought was very relevant to us all as writers trying to make sense of world events in a language that doesn't make much sense at all.

"Let’s face it - English is a crazy language. There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine in pineapple. English muffins weren’t invented in England or French fries in France. Sweetmeats are candies while sweetbreads, which aren’t sweet, are meat. We take English for granted. But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.
And why is it that writers write but fingers don’t fing, grocers don’t groce and hammers don’t ham? If the plural of tooth is teeth, why isn’t the plural of booth beeth? One goose, 2 geese. So one moose, 2 meese? One index, 2 indices? Doesn’t it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend? If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?
If teachers taught, why didn’t preachers praught? If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat? In what language do people recite at a play and play at a recital? Ship by truck and send cargo by ship? Have noses that run and feet that smell? How can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while a wise man and a wise guy are opposites?
You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which an alarm goes off by going on. English was invented by people, not computers, and it reflects the creativity of the human race (which, of course, isn’t a race at all). That is why, when the stars are out, they are visible, but when the lights are out, they are invisible."

I'm sure there is some kind of linguistic explanation for all this craziness, but how many of us actually stop to think about? In a world full of a whole bunch of crazy, what's a crazy language?



Lecture Two: Telling Factual Stories With Text (Rod Chester)

This week we had a guest speaker, Rod Chester, who gave us an insight into the experiences he's had throughout his journey as a journalist. His main tip as a news writer (or any type of writer really), was to make use of the 'inverted triangle' as your form of writing. Historians believe that this method dates back to the 19th century wartime, when reporters sent stories out via telegraph. They wanted to get the most important information out first, just in case the transmission was interrupted. 



So you say we don't write telegraphs anymore, so why still use this method? Because today, more than ever, we are sending out more and more messages that can be interrupted by our recipients own distractions, impatience, confusion or even boredom. In such a busy time, readers expect their writers to get to the meat as quickly as possible or they'll just go somewhere else for the story.


Chester spent the remainder of the lecture advising us on different ways to draw in our readers with popular, fresh and interesting starting paragraphs. Some of his ideas were:
  • Start with "it's official!"
  • The question intro
  • Reverse psychology
  • Rhythm, Rhyme and reason
  • Set the scene
  • Irony
  • Mystery
  • Story time


Overdue Reflection of Lecture One: Telling Factual Stories

My first semester and second lecture at UQ... an introductory lesson and an overview of the course. I enjoyed the style of the lecture which was very laid back yet informative. We discussed what it would be to be a journalist, what it takes, and whether journalism is dying - a very controversial topic these days. 


"Journalism is the first rough draft of history."
Philip Graham, Publisher, The Washington Post. 

"I became a journalist to come as close as possible to the heart of the world." 
Henry R. Luce, American Publisher and Editor. 

Journalism is the voice of the world. It is the words of those who aren't afraid to speak up. It is the stories of those who seek the heart of the world. It is passion at it's finest. Without it, we'd live in silence. Our mistakes would be repeated time and time again. Our triumphs would go unnoticed and unrewarded. But this isn't to say that all journalism out there is indeed 'telling factual stories'. To say that all journalists are truthful, would be to say that Adolf Hitler were pro racial diversity. However, in saying this, not everything we read is a whole load of bollocks either. We just have to go through life with a giant, metaphorical sieve to separate the reality from gossip. 

"People may expect too much of journalism. 
Not only do they expect it to be entertaining, they expect it to be true."
Lewis H. Lapham, Editor – Harper’s Magazine.

*Note to self: Learn how to be come a humorous yet truthful journalist, all at the same time. 






Wednesday 10 August 2011

Just the beginning of my journalism adventures

Hey everyone,

I'm Erin, I'm nineteen years old and currently studying a Bachelor of Journalism. To be brutally honest, the reason I chose this course is because I haven't yet found where I want to go with my life - I'm absolutely disgraceful when it comes to making decisions for myself. However, I do know that I'm passionate about seeing the world, exploring everything it has to offer, and sharing my experiences and knowledge with those who are willing to listen. 

I'm Australian - born here, but raised in Asia (Singapore and Hong Kong). I moved back to Australia earlier this year to start university, beginning my studies with a Bachelor of Media and Communication at QUT before changing my course and starting at UQ. I have a sister (who I live with) and two brothers (who unfortunately still live overseas). My obsession with needing to know whats going on in the world around me, coupled with my inexorable love for travel will hopefully one day lead me down the path to a job in travel journalism or something of the sorts (if I don't end up changing my mind, which is inevitable). But for now, my plan is to finish this course and enjoy life as it comes.